tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1390418611126522107.post2428122817694100695..comments2024-02-23T05:54:49.314-08:00Comments on Dragonflies & damselflies of Thailand: 171. Indolestes anomalus Fraser, 1946Dennis Farrellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03701639261464979300noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1390418611126522107.post-44813205670935465422015-03-02T22:48:35.150-08:002015-03-02T22:48:35.150-08:00Maybe Noppadon has some important unpublished info...Maybe Noppadon has some important unpublished information on I. anomalus and its characters? Then it must be published, as well as other his important data.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1390418611126522107.post-60173312116184637772015-03-02T22:43:19.248-08:002015-03-02T22:43:19.248-08:00It was me, Oleg ))
And my address is kosterin@bion...It was me, Oleg ))<br />And my address is kosterin@bionet.nsc.ruAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1390418611126522107.post-51859911996492633362015-03-02T22:41:36.714-08:002015-03-02T22:41:36.714-08:00So wierd and magic!
Right now I realised an utmost...So wierd and magic!<br />Right now I realised an utmost need of seeing male anal appendages in dorsal view of Indolestes birmanus, which have never been figured. (Because I have to compare my Cambodian male). I came to you site to see if you have something dorsal of this species and discovered that your latest post was on Indolestes! Then:<br /><br />1. Could you kindly send me high resolution photos of I. birmanus which you have. Although neither of those you posted shows exactly the right angle, they could help me to see at least anything.<br /><br />2. I am sorry but I believe yours is not Indolestes anomalus. The main diagnostic feature of this species is a truly anomalous pterostigma which is nearly as short as high. Nothing like this on your photos. Other characters mentioned at the description are diagnostic, the species was described by a single female so information on appendaged was missing. Although Hamalainen & Pinratana, 1999 reported more specimens, as far as I know they were never figured and the male never described. I wonder how Noppadon could identify yours as I. anomalus? Please, ask him.<br /><br />3. Maybe decision was "what else if neither birmanus nor inflatus? - then anomalus". Then why not birmanus? Please, let me know.<br /><br />4. Most probably, you were puzzled by humeral spots on synthorax instead of a contiguous humeral stripe. I must say this character is variable in sympecmatinae and the related Indoleses gracilis from Ceylon may have a stripe (rarely), spots or nothing there. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com